Books

Federal Ruling Says that AI Art Can’t Be Copyrighted

Products You May Like

The latest in the AI debate is a ruling delivered Friday by federal Judge Beryl Howell, which upholds a U.S. Copyright Office finding. The finding — and the federal ruling — both state that artwork created by AI can’t be copyrighted.

This comes as people like CEO of Imagination Engines Stephen Thaler fight for works created by AI to be protected under copyright law. Thaler filed a lawsuit after the U.S. Copyright Office refused his request for artwork created by his computer system to be copyrighted. Thaler believes that AI should be considered “an author where it otherwise meets authorship criteria.” This is despite the fact that AI learns by using other artists’ and writers’ work, uncredited.

Even with this federal ruling, though, works created by AI may still be protected under copyright laws. The U.S. Copyright Office said it would consider each copyright case involving AI individually. Mashable explained that this could be boiled down to whether a work was produced solely by AI or if a human being had a hand in it. If a person is involved, the work could possibly be protected by copyright laws.

Find more news and stories of interest from the book world in Breaking in Books.

Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

Amid Channing Tatum And Jenna Dewan’s Legal Battle, Insider Drops Claims On How They’re Handling Co-Parenting And More
Project UrbEx
Marisa Abela Shares How Public Scrutiny Impacted Her Portrayal of Amy Winehouse in ‘Back to Black’ (Exclusive)
‘Supergirl: Woman Of Tomorrow’, The Second Pic From James Gunn & Peter Safran’s DC Studios, Gets Summer 2026 Release
Monsters of Folk Announce Debut Album Reissue, Share Archival Song “Disappeared”: Listen